Must vs Shall .
v. a choice to act or not, or a promise of a possibility, as distinguished from "shall," which makes it imperative. Contracts and agreements are important for conducting business for all sizes of companies. In a commercial contract setting, you want to be sure that the strength of obligation agreed by the parties is reflected in the agreement.. However, shall is used more in legal circles while must is used more often by common people. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. The car MUST have a key, or else you don't get paid. In earlier decades, there were few written business contracts, and many business and personal deals were done with a handshake. Please be sure to answer the question.Provide details and share your research! Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Both of them indicate the fact that something is mandatory and should be carried out as a duty. Traditionally, conventions dictate that: ‘Will’ when used in the first person, conveys an obligation, whereas ‘shall’ merely a future intention. ‘Shall’, ‘must’ and ‘will’ are all modal verbs (verbs used to express an obligation). Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. Technical specifications don't need to be great prose, so just use "must" There are a couple of notes about your question: You say "They are pretty much recommendations (i.e., we do not impose anything)".
If a problem arose, the two parties could take the issue to court, and a judge would hear the case even if the contract was not put into writing. But avoid …. Must and shall are words in English language that have similar meanings. 2) in statutes, and sometimes in contracts, the word "may" must be read in context to determine if it means an act is optional or mandatory, for it may be an imperative. may. The purpose of the terms "MUST" or SHALL in the technical language is to impose obligations.